Comments for Collogue http://marcopg.org Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:27:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 Comment on HTML activities by Collogue » GObject Introspection from node.js http://marcopg.org/2011/06/12/html-activities/#comment-262 Collogue » GObject Introspection from node.js Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:27:28 +0000 http://marcopg.org/?p=466#comment-262 [...] platform accessible from node.js. That’s something I was dreaming of when I experimented with HTML activities. Maybe I should pick that experiment up again some time… Comments (0) Trackbacks [...] [...] platform accessible from node.js. That’s something I was dreaming of when I experimented with HTML activities. Maybe I should pick that experiment up again some time… Comments (0) Trackbacks [...]

]]> Comment on HTML activities by ep - Sugar Digest 2011-07-09 http://marcopg.org/2011/06/12/html-activities/#comment-230 ep - Sugar Digest 2011-07-09 Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:11:31 +0000 http://marcopg.org/?p=466#comment-230 [...] Marco Pesenti Gritti has been working on a framework for HTML activities (See [2] for [...] [...] Marco Pesenti Gritti has been working on a framework for HTML activities (See [2] for [...]

]]> Comment on HTML activities by marcopg http://marcopg.org/2011/06/12/html-activities/#comment-191 marcopg Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:16:36 +0000 http://marcopg.org/?p=466#comment-191 Yup! That would actually be pretty easy. We would write a special engine which would run on a web server rather than locally. Then activities would work without modifications. Yup! That would actually be pretty easy. We would write a special engine which would run on a web server rather than locally. Then activities would work without modifications.

]]> Comment on HTML activities by vtaylor http://marcopg.org/2011/06/12/html-activities/#comment-190 vtaylor Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:04:54 +0000 http://marcopg.org/?p=466#comment-190 With this approach, does it become possible to have web-accessible demos for Activities? It would be sooo helpful to have anyone interested in OLPC be able to "try it" and see what it really does before they have to install anything. With this approach, does it become possible to have web-accessible demos for Activities? It would be sooo helpful to have anyone interested in OLPC be able to “try it” and see what it really does before they have to install anything.

]]> Comment on Lecce by sumita karmakar http://marcopg.org/2009/01/03/lecce/#comment-188 sumita karmakar Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:16:54 +0000 http://www.marcopg.org/?p=175#comment-188 you got some quality pictures..... i love lecce thats why i visited lecce thrice (way from india).... and will come soon -sk you got some quality pictures…..
i love lecce thats why i visited lecce thrice (way from india)….
and will come soon
-sk

]]> Comment on Making it easy to build sugar from source by Mel http://marcopg.org/2010/08/23/making-it-easy-to-build-sugar-from-source/#comment-102 Mel Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:01:30 +0000 http://marcopg.org/?p=458#comment-102 It's great to have you back, Marco - this is *exactly* what I wished would happen for sugar development. Mmm, un-bottlenecking. It’s great to have you back, Marco – this is *exactly* what I wished would happen for sugar development. Mmm, un-bottlenecking.

]]> Comment on Contributing to Sugar by Julie http://marcopg.org/2010/07/19/contributing-to-sugar/#comment-52 Julie Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:49:12 +0000 http://www.marcopg.org/2010/07/19/contributing-to-sugar/#comment-52 Thanks! I very much look forward to following your efforts at clarifying the review process, and will think about the other questions you bring up too. Have a great day! Thanks! I very much look forward to following your efforts at clarifying the review process, and will think about the other questions you bring up too. Have a great day!

]]> Comment on Contributing to Sugar by marcopg http://marcopg.org/2010/07/19/contributing-to-sugar/#comment-45 marcopg Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:48:17 +0000 http://www.marcopg.org/2010/07/19/contributing-to-sugar/#comment-45 Hi! You are making a very good point about newcomers reclutance to express negative feedback. I noticed it a lot and I think it's one of the main reason things didn't improve much. I'm not sure how to help it, ideas welcome, but I suspect being more proactive about seeking this kind of feedback would be a start. About the specific issue of patch reviews. I think the official process is still to open a bug in trac and attach the patch to it. There has been a lot of discussion about using mailing list instead but it was never really decided. The fact that this is not clear is of of course a major problem already :) Tackling review process is actually one of my top priorities, so your feedback is very useful. I agree with you, it should be possible to contribute to Sugar without being forced to follow high volume communication channels. Your comment made me happy, thanks for posting it. Keep feedback coming, your perspective is very valuable! Hi!

You are making a very good point about newcomers reclutance to express negative feedback. I noticed it a lot and I think it’s one of the main reason things didn’t improve much. I’m not sure how to help it, ideas welcome, but I suspect being more proactive about seeking this kind of feedback would be a start.

About the specific issue of patch reviews. I think the official process is still to open a bug in trac and attach the patch to it. There has been a lot of discussion about using mailing list instead but it was never really decided. The fact that this is not clear is of of course a major problem already :) Tackling review process is actually one of my top priorities, so your feedback is very useful. I agree with you, it should be possible to contribute to Sugar without being forced to follow high volume communication channels.

Your comment made me happy, thanks for posting it. Keep feedback coming, your perspective is very valuable!

]]> Comment on Talking vs doing by marcopg http://marcopg.org/2010/08/08/talking-vs-doing/#comment-44 marcopg Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:07:16 +0000 http://www.marcopg.org/2010/08/08/talking-vs-doing/#comment-44 Sorry for the lack of context, I was talking about Sugar development :) Yes! I'm going to take this as a chance to try and simplify the process. I'm thinking to start by documenting it in a few, simple steps and then fix things up to actually work that way. I had a deadline at work, so last week I didn't really make progress on it, but I'm hoping to have something to show by the end of this one. Sorry for the lack of context, I was talking about Sugar development :)

Yes! I’m going to take this as a chance to try and simplify the process. I’m thinking to start by documenting it in a few, simple steps and then fix things up to actually work that way.

I had a deadline at work, so last week I didn’t really make progress on it, but I’m hoping to have something to show by the end of this one.

]]> Comment on Talking vs doing by marcopg http://marcopg.org/2010/08/08/talking-vs-doing/#comment-43 marcopg Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:59:06 +0000 http://www.marcopg.org/2010/08/08/talking-vs-doing/#comment-43 I moved my blog to another server and permalinks was screwed up. It should work now... Thanks for letting me know! I moved my blog to another server and permalinks was screwed up. It should work now… Thanks for letting me know!

]]>